FANDOM


Team VS Character Edit

Since the girls have the same appearance (and will quite possibly have the same appearance) should we just have a character page for them in case they are not named?--Omojuze (talk) 19:10, December 25, 2015 (UTC)

You mean three separate articles for each individual? Lol there's no point-- They were introduced in the manga as the "3 Angels of the 5th" which is a team, not character(s). It's just simpler we keep them categorised as a team unless we get information saying otherwise; hope you understand my point.
Also... Really? All of this nonsense on Christmas Day.... Something needs to be done about this. GouenjiShuuya'123 (talk) 20:16, December 25, 2015 (UTC)
What Gouenji said and its boxing day, not Christmas ;) --Sarutobii2 (talk) 20:35, December 25, 2015 (UTC)
IT MIGHT BE FOR YOU BUT FOR MOST OF US IT'S STILL XMAS xD--- only a few hours left, I hope everybody enjoyed their day o/--GouenjiShuuya'123 (talk) 20:59, December 25, 2015 (UTC)
Having 3 separate articles for these unnamed non important characters seems incredible pointless. --Maki Oze (talk) 10:55, December 29, 2015 (UTC)
No no no, not three unnamed characters. Take it as if we were to take this page and convert it from a team article to a character article, as when the girls show their ability, we won't be able to add a description of it here :(--Omojuze (talk) 11:40, December 29, 2015 (UTC)
I think most of us would rather it as it is? So lets leave it I guess, unless Jackal/other users voice their opinion~--GouenjiShuuya'123 (talk) 12:09, December 29, 2015 (UTC)
Oh that's what you meant Omo. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 17:31, December 29, 2015 (UTC)

Probably best to discuss this if and when they display an ability. --Shinra Kusakabe (talk) 00:03, December 31, 2015 (UTC)

Rename? Edit

To "5th Angels 3". Does it make sense? No. Unfortunately, it's how the author intended it to be. Dunno. Thoughts?--BerserkerPhantom (talk) 20:59, July 5, 2016 (UTC)

I don't mind changing it; if we're going by straight translations on the wiki (which we have been), then changing it to this would make sense.--GouenjiShuuya'123 (talk) 09:08, July 6, 2016 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.