Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-27797856-20160328140628/@comment-1251315-20160329201904

Firstly can I just say I hope this isn't your reply to every individual consensus thread that Omo or I create because, well that's just plain unfair. That's just a dumb response: we are responding to the idea by saying that it has the potential to cause edit wars based on previous experience on this wiki. There are ideas that you and Omojuze have proposed on the wiki in the past that we've supported, so suggesting that we're opposing this due to the creator of the consensus is a ridiculous thing to be saying.

This is the kind of response I would expect from someone who is not happy that people are opposing their suggestion and not blindly supporting, instead of weighing up the pro's and cons, past experience and forming a unbiased decision based on all of those factors. (no offence meant, just stating what "my opinion" is).

so I think that we should definitely *at least* test this idea, and if there is no edit war over it, then it can stay. I'm sorry, I thought we're trying to make a consensus here. Comments like this indicate that we're not forming a consensus: that's just saying "we're testing it and screw you if you don't like the idea because your opinion doesn't mean anything".

Just because a test "works" does not mean people "want it", people are once again making yet another assumption about other users that is wrong.

General comments:
 * Collapsible tables work just fine, there is nothing wrong with them and this seems just like a blatant effort to remove a lot of the "automation" that is intended to simplify user contributions, just because "one user does not like them".
 * Y'all need to stop bringing up Narutopedia at every god damn chance you can get, this has nothing to do with "copying the Narutopedia", because collapsing tables are a useful feature that y'all like to keep insulting because you personally dislike them.
 * I personally don't care how many "counter measures" are brought up, because my experience has shown that it does not matter how many exist: people will just ignore them anyway and add what they feel like adding.

But it seems like only one user's opinion matters nowadays on this wiki and we're apparently just going to ignore months of edit wars that occurred when this was proposed and rejected before.