Thread:Unok/@comment-27945402-20160531205355/@comment-3544775-20160609021620

"Non of us", just lurked a bit and even saw you "yet to see a valid proof". And here I provided you one, I can provide you more, but it obviously doesn't matter. You have been declining it ever since the beginning.

My favicon magically appeared here, less than 1 day before you guys contacted me on my wiki (lucky coincidence obviously). You can shut me as much as you want. I asked for that forum the first time we spoke, no one gave it. Even if it was from a forum like you said, they still took it from me (like I said I can further prove it's the exact same as mine).

Sue you? Where did I say that? I just commented on his saying: "edit something a little bit and makes you the creator". So by his logic if I edit something here, it will make me creator, making me capable of complaining for stealing. I was mostly mocking his logic. Obviously I don't know anything about copyright infringement as I neither have read wikia rules and have lived under a rock all this time.

The mangaka did create the favicon? And my comment is stupid? Do you hear yourself? Show me where did the mangaka create the favicon, please. If he did it, he must have shared it somewhere officially. The mangaka created the image of the character, I created from it a favicon. Thus I'm the creator of the favicon, not that I have drawn the image. Obviously creating a favicon means editing too. It's like, when you create an article, someone comes and edit it (he is editor), while you are creator and editor (given that you actually did add lots of content, or any summary/text/etc). And by your logic, the mangaka created the article himself XD If I take image of Mona Lisa and create a wallpaper/favicon/etc from it, it will mean that da Vinci himself created that wallpaper/favicon/etc. Funny! XD He would be the creator of Mona Lisa, not the creator of the wallpaper/favicon/etc.

So basically you guys will be salty and complain for me taking your content, but you are fine taking my content. I was looking for that answer :) And guess what, I'm part of another wiki which content was stolen by different wiki (pure copy-paste of our articles, templates, images), we complained at wikia and they did nothing, stating something like if I remember correctly: "the license which Wikia uses allows copying of text content". While they only mentioned text, they didn't do anything for templates and images (both originally created specifically for our wiki). It's stupid that someone can copy-paste your article, and I have argued with Wikia about that, but just by knowing the very little detail on how copy-paste is allowed, unfortunately anyone can copy all of your articles...

Duh, I got a message by Arakawa Kou. Do you see me editing here? And you keep replying to my messages, so I'm also replying.

Ah that dick move, I asked you not to request closure, but you guys are so respectful that went and did exactly that. I can easily reopen it (all I need to say, I will be active on it, and Wikia will open it again) or even register another. Can even take content from here, following wikia "rules". But I don't like doing dick moves, like other people, so I'm not going to bother with that.

I think I will be stopping here. I provided 1 proof (which I'm sure it won't be enough for you guys). I only came to reply the guy who wrote me, but you had to turn it into a pointless discussion. I also got a reply on how you are fine on taking other peoples work, but are not fine on your work being taken. You also ran out of arguments and started insult attempts, so I will stop, otherwise things will go even more ugly. Have fun replying here and disapproving my comment, making more comments on the closed wiki or any other things you can produce.