Thread:Maki Oze/@comment-2140588-20151029111745/@comment-27047819-20151029202427

The Tokyo article didnt need a stub, it included all known information and was organised, it just looked ugly. Feel free to correct me on why it was specifically there.

As for the Tamaki article," tagged for convenience" d oesnt shed light on why its tagged. So how can you blame someone for removing it if there under the impression thats its not needed anymore?

Im fine with stubs, but in the edit summary please include something like "this charcters is lacking a personality and or apperance", rather than me guessing and hoping for the best. Thank you.