Talk:Special Fire Force Company 8

Mission Tab
The Mission kind of makes the article look really long and kind of confusing in my opinion, so to resolve it, could we make a tabber for the "Missions"?--GouenjiShuuya&#39;123 (talk) 14:31, December 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Ech. Looks fine to me the way it is now imo.--Omojuze (talk) 14:35, December 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Remove participants because it can be covered in the mission description. --Maki Oze (talk) 14:46, December 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Tabber is something to avoid for the body of an article. Tabber relies on Javascript and there are people out there who don't have it enabled in their browsers. There is no fallback if JS is disabled, which means large sections of text would be missing. Tabber is kept exclusively for use in images as that kind of information is not necessary to be displayed if the user disables JS and should not be used to simply "hide" content on the basis of "the page is too long". --Sajuuk 14:49, December 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * @Maki Oze: The problem is is that it's an easy way to list all the participants. For example, if the 8th Brigade gets 21 members total in the future, but only 15 of them participate in a mission, we'll have to list all of the participants, and that would make the paragraph very very long >_<. It's easier to do the way it is now, a.k.a. separately.--Omojuze (talk) 15:26, December 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't think any article needs a tab atm if ever. I edited the mission description to acknowledge the participants and since the descriptions already cover the mission status, i removed both the missions status/participants since its repetition.--Sarutobii2 (talk) 22:33, January 4, 2016 (UTC)
 * My argument for keeping the participants: The problem with not listing them is that the 'whole brigade' was not yet whole in chapters 0, 1 and 2 and if more members show up we would have to make changes again so this way is more beneficial. Also it makes the provided information neutral in the sense of time frame. :] --&ensp;Knight_of_Jackal talk&ensp; 23:21, January 4, 2016 (UTC)
 * Didn't see someone replied... The mission description reflects what happens on the mission, not what happens afterwards like someone else joining. So saying, entire, all members or whole is correct. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 00:20, January 5, 2016 (UTC)