Thread:Maki Oze/@comment-2140588-20151029111745/@comment-27047819-20151029183736

I read that Tamaki's article was a stub, added additional information so it wasnt a stub anymore and removed it. Thats how stubs get removed, no?

As Sajuuk said a stub is "''less than minimum information available to the reader" which those 2 articles weren't after my edits. ''If those articles were still stubs, why did no one put it back on or revert my edit.

Moral of the story is anyone is allowed to edit on a wiki, doesnt matter if your a admin or even the founder, it doesnt make your word law, neither would mine be if i put a stub on a article and said not to remove it.