Talk:Human Body Ignition Phenomenon

Separate Generation articles
So I'm thinking to create individual articles for First-Third Generations. What do y'all think?-- GouenjiShuuya&#39;123 (talk) 14:01, January 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * That would be a good idea. Currently the Generation articles are just redirects (iirc), so feel free to convert them into actual pages (Y) --Sajuuk 14:02, January 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * Coolio (y) Also I just remembered that the First Generation article is the Flame Human article, so we only need the Second Generation and Third Generation article.-- GouenjiShuuya&#39;123 (talk) 14:05, January 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * That's fine with me. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 14:10, January 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * I'll make a start on it now then~.--GouenjiShuuya&#39;123 (talk) 14:14, January 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * Be simpler to re-name Ignition Ability to Third Generation and have all that information in 1 place. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 14:18, January 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * You have a point. o/--GouenjiShuuya&#39;123 (talk) 14:24, January 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * And for the 2nd gen article, you could make a table of their abilities exactly like the 1 on the ignition ability article. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 14:27, January 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * I think if we were to add the same table to the Second Generation article then it would seem too repetitive, so I asked Sajuuk to create an infobox template instead to list all the Second Gens.--GouenjiShuuya&#39;123 (talk) 14:56, January 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * I think it would look better if we list the debut's within the infobox and also re-name Flame Human to First Generation to keep in line with the other 2 articles. --Shinra Kusakabe (talk) 15:41, January 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * Whatever looks neater is better. Just remember that the infobox is really for information that can't be listed in the main body of a page, not for "all" information that could easily be listed as a paragraph or sentence within the article. --Sajuuk 16:08, January 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * That's why i removed traits because that can all be said in the article. As for the debuts/rename, im fine with both. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 12:41, January 20, 2016 (UTC)